← Aellic Evidenz
Has the athlete trained enough to return to play safely? The acute:chronic workload ratio permits clinicians to quantify a player's risk of subsequent injury
Blanch, Gabbett · 2016 · British Journal of Sports Medicine 50(8):471–475
What this work gives Aellic
The actual origin of the four-week chronic window Aellic computes against: injury likelihood is modelled against “acute load spikes above what they have been doing on average over the past 4 weeks (chronic load)”, with a polynomial fit of R² = 0.53 across three sports. Also the source of the sweet-spot figure that gabbett2016 reproduces.
Where this sits in the engine
6 declared sites: constants and thresholds in the code that point at this entry.
- Training Daily strain: session load, recommended range, weekly corridor 3 sites
- Training Training load — zones, TRIMP, ACWR 3 sites
Also in Training
- 2026 The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains
- 2023 Influence of Resistance Training Proximity-to-Failure on Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis
- 2022 Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis